Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Igor Sijsling vs Remko De Rijke Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sijsling vs Rijke analysis and find out who is favored!
Igor Sijsling vs Remko De Rijke Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sijsling 0 - 0 Rijke
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sijsling has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Rijke has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sijsling, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Rijke has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sijsling has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rijke has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sijsling has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 1), with Rijke winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sijsling has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 165/ 104), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 31/ 29). Rijke has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Sijsling has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Rijke has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sijsling has played against opponents with an average rank of 513 while Rijke has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sijsling has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rijke has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sijsling has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rijke has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
36
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
37
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Igor Sijsling vs Remko De Rijke For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Sijsling VS Rijke
Sportsbook
Offer
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Igor Sijsling | Remko De Rijke |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Igor Sijsling Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Igor Sijsling
71%
(
60 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
96)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
23 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
100
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Igor Sijsling
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Vrbensky
Player
Igor Sijsling
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Igor Sijsling
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Igor Sijsling
Player
Kaichi Uchida
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Igor Sijsling
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 2-6 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Igor Sijsling
Player
Daniel Siniakov
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
74%
(
42 of
57)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Igor Sijsling
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Igor Sijsling
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
11
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Igor Sijsling
Player
Nicola Kuhn
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
43
Total Points Won
34
|
7-5 0-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Remko De Rijke Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Marco Speronello
Player
Remko de Rijke
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Florian Fallert
Player
Remko de Rijke
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
57%
(
17 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 3-6 7-6(9) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 5-7 6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 3-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-7(7) 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Sijsling Vs Rijke Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Sijsling are available here and Rijke photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
